When does a douch become a hero?

Danny Bonaduce speaks his mind to a douch

and more

Public transport

I have worked out why public transport is wrong.Well it’s like this; It’s all on their terms.

You see, I got up at 7 this , showered, had breakfast, got to the station, got train, got to work and it was 8am very efficient if you think about it. 1 hour to accomplish that ( its more than I have accomplished in the two hours since I have been at work)

However the point is, it is not what I would have otherwise chosen to do. And in today’s world where marketers, companies, websites, and even banks personalize everything to your taste - down to my individual requirements and capabilities Public transport will never gain more popularity over other modes, as it does not meet my personal requirements, which is; not to be dictated to what time I have to get up; how fast I have to eat my breakfast; when I have to be at a train platform; and how many people I have to share my journey with.

Thus public transport will begin to fade away; the greens have no chance unless they ban everything.

Oh wait....they are trying to ban everything

Yip

You Have a Phlegmatic Temperament

Mild mannered and laid back, you take life at a slow pace. You are very consistent - both in emotions and actions. You tend to absorb set backs easily. You are cool and collected. It is difficult to offend you. You can remain composed and unemotional. You are a great friend and lover. You don't demand much of others. While you are quiet, you have a subtle wit that your friends know well. At your worst, you are lazy and unwilling to work at anything. You often get stuck in a rut, without aspirations or dreams. You can get too dependent on others, setting yourself up for abandonment.

What Temperment Are You?

I can't put it any other way

Hence, the famous "hockey stick" graph purporting to show climate over the past 1000 years, as a continuous, flat, millennium-long bungalow with a skyscraper tacked on for the 20th century. This graph was almost laughably fraudulent, not least because it used a formula that would generate a hockey stick shape no matter what data you input, even completely random, trendless, arbitrary computer-generated data. Yet such is the power of the eco-lobby that this fraud became the centrepiece of UN reports on global warming. If it's happening, why is it necessary to lie about it?